The Ministry of Finance, led by Janet Yellen, recently sold more short-term debt instruments than usual – presumably because it expects interest rates at the short end of the yield curve to fall and is aiming to renew them at a significantly lower level in a year’s time. However, selling short-term T-bills is no longer so easy, especially as demand from home and abroad is waning. Private investors are massively reducing their holdings because they also expect interest rates to fall and are increasingly shifting their capital to more promising markets.

In general, it is important to remember that the adjustment to the new environment with lower inflation and moderate macroeconomic risks has so far been largely orderly. This should not be taken for granted. When many attractive investment opportunities present themselves, the journey can be bumpier than expected.

To date, it remains remarkable that despite isolated inflation disappointments, there has been less bond volatility in the first half of 2024 than during the period when interest rates were on their way up. Many seem to realize: When interest rates are rising, the destination is worryingly uncertain; on the way down, despite the ups and downs of individual macroeconomic data, we know the end point is somewhere between zero and where we are now. This obviously has a calming effect and reduces volatility.

This also results in a focus for the next twelve months: the preference for the middle points of the yield curve. This is where interest rates will fall, particularly in the USA. Because yields at the shorter end of the yield curve are primarily determined by key interest rate expectations, the highest interest rates are effectively capped and will ensure an upward movement in the total yield of medium-term bonds.

The extent of this remains uncertain, but we are keen to benefit from it. By contrast, the medium-term yield prospects on the Swiss franc yield curve have diminished due to the Swiss National Bank’s rapid monetary policy adjustment to the renewed inflation environment.

Further out on the curve, interest rates are somewhat higher than at the start of the year (with the exception of Switzerland) and have caused price losses on the corresponding USD and EUR bonds. Added to this are the costs of currency hedging. A number of other factors are also determining yields at the longer end of the yield curve: for example, concerns about the sustainability of US government debt through to uncertainty about growth trends and the term premium. These considerations ensure that the upside and downside risks are currently symmetrical.

The choice on the CHF bond market is about a hundred times smaller than on the USD bond market. This makes diversification (sectors, maturities, ratings) more difficult. Liquidity is also lower, which is almost more significant than the poor sector weighting. In the Swiss bond market there are many mortgage bonds, an indirect financing instrument of the banks, and direct bank bonds. Together with public corporations (state, cantons, municipalities), these account for around 75% of the market volume. Non-financial companies play a minor role in the Swiss Bond Index.

In fact, the larger Swiss companies also prefer to finance themselves on the more liquid EUR and USD bond markets. Whether Nestlé or Roche, SwissRe or Helvetia – transactions in CHF are rare.

In the current monetary policy environment, it is also important to be broadly diversified across numerous sectors in the second half of the year and to remain carefully selective at company level. There are still opportunities on the bond markets, but discipline is required, particularly in the area of top ratings.

Swiss hospitals are among the areas that we have consistently avoided. These made negative headlines due to deficits, among other things. Unsurprisingly, individual bonds are trading well below their issue price. The Seespital bond, which matures in one year, is currently trading 24% below its nominal value. Some are even trading 50% lower (e.g. Wetzikon).

The selection makes the difference. There are also solid hospital bonds, e.g. from the Bern University Hospital Foundation Inselspital and the University Hospital Foundation Children’s Hospital Zurich. However, the spread of 125 basis points shows that investors want to be compensated for the credit risk – with a premium such as that paid by the Zug-based commodities trader Glencore with its BBB+ rating.

For the Swiss Bond Index (SBI Total AAA-BBB), the average redemption yield is only 1.0% (vs. 1.4% at the end of May). The duration is over seven years (7.2). If interest rates rise slightly, bond prices fall immediately. The higher bond prices in Swiss francs compared to the beginning of the year are due to the fact that the benchmark yields of the two-year Swiss Confederation fell by 43 basis points to 0.6% and those of the ten-year Swiss Confederation by 21 basis points to 0.4%. Yields rose and prices fell in all other European countries.

The long-awaited reverse scenario is now emerging on the major bond markets (USD, EUR, GBP). Key interest rates are falling and driving up bond prices. The risk of market distortions is low. Credit risk premiums remain stable.

The current recovery potential of the Zugerberg Income Fund (ZIF), around 20% of which is linked to the Swiss Bond Index and 80% to the World Bond Index, is much greater than that of the Swiss Bond Index. This is likely to manifest itself over the next 12 to 18 months, as falling key interest rates will probably drive the World Bond Index up much more strongly than the Swiss Bond Index.

This is due to the fact that the key interest rates implicitly traded on the market are around 144 basis points (dollar) and around 124 basis points (euro) lower in one year. Over two years, they are 194 and 156 basis points respectively. We are therefore looking at a period in which significant interest rate cuts are expected.

After seven months, the total return on the ZIF is +0.6%, while the world bond index (-0.4%) is still in the red so far this year.

The ZIF improved further at the beginning of August. In the short term, however, we are already in the middle of a turnaround in key interest rates. Last July, the ZIF (+1.5%) rose noticeably more than the Swiss Bond Index (+1.2%) in the wake of expectations of monetary policy easing in the USA and the eurozone.

The Credit Opportunities Fund (COF) has achieved a return of +5.4% in the year to date. However, the main reason for this is not the expectations of interest rate cuts, but the robust economy. The duration risks are relatively low.

The current prospects of lower interest rates are in turn attracting more money to the credit markets favored by the COF. Although credit risk premiums have fallen somewhat over the course of the year, they remain attractive and make a constant and continuous contribution to sustainable returns, while the Swiss Bond Index, for example, has benefited from a one-off shift in the yield curve.

The COF (currency-hedged) generates monthly returns of +0.4%, which is significantly higher than those of the Swiss Bond Index (+0.1%) and also explains the long-term excess return over the Swiss Bond Index.

As we expect the Swiss franc to tend to strengthen over the next 12 months as a result of the economic cycle, it is worth consistently hedging the foreign currencies in the portfolio. The appreciation of the franc may not be comparable to that of 2023, but it is likely to be particularly strong against the dollar in the medium term.

The low supply of housing in the mountain communities favored the highest price increases in the mountains. The price trend in other regions was weaker. In many places in north-western and eastern Switzerland, prices are currently below the previous year’s levels.

Current demand for owner-occupied homes is well below pre-pandemic levels. Even the lower key interest rates and thus falling financing costs are unlikely to change this, as the rules of affordability are based on the imputed interest rate of 5%, not on the actual interest charges, even if these are fixed for many years to come.

In order to assess whether the affordability requirements are met, the financial institutions must make the following calculation at the behest of the supervisory authorities: The annual cost of the property (imputed interest rate of 5% of the mortgage + amortization + ancillary costs 1% of the market value) should not exceed 33% of your gross income.

At least 20% of the value of the property must be financed with equity. At least 10% must be financed with equity capital that does not come from occupational benefits. For example, if a property costs CHF 800,000, CHF 160,000 must be financed from equity. There are only a few exceptions to this policy.

In addition, the higher the age, the stricter the requirements for granting mortgages. Financial circumstances can change considerably as a result of retirement.

Due to the yield curve, two- to four-year mortgage loans can be taken out at well below 2% in the current environment. For a loan of CHF 640,000, this means monthly interest charges of around CHF 1,067.

Back to the investment solutions: Our portfolios contain real estate and infrastructure investments, each with a broad diversification. In July, all values increased. Not all positions have been convincing this year. The infrastructure operator Vinci (-4% total return since the beginning of the year) is clearly lagging behind the leader, Zurich Airport (+19%). In between are the sustainable energy group BKW (+9%) and Veolia Environnement (+6%).

By adding real estate and infrastructure investments, the efficiency of a typical equity+bond portfolio can be increased over longer periods, as their volatility is lower than that of the overall equity market, while still achieving comparable returns.

Over a longer term, the Swiss stock market beats the world stock index. When it comes to the purely economic-fundamental view of Nestlé in comparison with Unilever and Danone, for example, investors are obviously prepared to pay a premium. This is the case with various market-leading Swiss companies, such as Sika (construction chemicals), Alcon (ophthalmology), SGS (goods testing company) and also Holcim (building materials) and Partners Group (private market asset manager).

A consistently higher valuation is the result of years of communication with the capital market and the fulfillment of the company’s own forecasts. It can also be attributed to greater market coverage (Nestlé) or a broader product range (Sika, SGS). Both of these factors ensure better diversification of earnings sources and thus lower fluctuations in actual results.

The Swiss stock market also offers a number of well-known companies that are on the verge of a major growth spurt. Liquidity is also high, which increases the attractiveness of listed shares. Swiss equities are valued worldwide, especially in volatile market phases, due to their defensive nature. Swiss quality stocks usually come through crises (e.g. pandemic) better than their competitors and have excellent resilience. And even if the US economy begins to flatten out, many Swiss companies are recording robust earnings growth.

Another advantage over many equities is the Swiss corporate culture, which distributes a significant portion of total earnings to shareholders in the form of dividends. And because total earnings increase in a growing economy, the sum of all distributions also increases. From a risk perspective, high-dividend companies are interesting because they often operate in defensive, mature markets and are therefore less susceptible to economic cycles. In technical terms, this results in lower volatility.

An equity portfolio also requires sector diversification. We therefore consider it important to hold US tech giants in the portfolio, as this segment could not be covered in Switzerland. Thanks to the 18% share of technology stocks in the equity portfolio in risk class 5, we did not miss out on the ongoing technology rally. We realized some of the price gains following the sharp rise, but remain exposed to above-average levels. According to UBS, the average equity portfolio of a Swiss bank client contains only around 5% tech stocks.

Despite global economic growth and the resulting increase in energy demand, particularly in emerging markets, and despite production cuts by the oil-producing cartel OPEC+, the price of crude oil remains stable.

The last major downward spikes occurred in March 2020 (outbreak of the coronavirus pandemic) and upward spikes in March 2022 (war of aggression against Ukraine). Overall, however, crude oil prices have hardly caused any more worrying developments over a longer period of time. Nevertheless, it will be interesting to see how the various economies deal with this issue.

Significant parts of the European economy, for example, are now decoupled from crude oil. The energy intensity of GDP development there has decreased and energy sources have been successfully diversified. This remains important in order to steer value creation in the right direction.

Importing crude oil not only worsens the balance of trade, but also pollutes the environment and creates political dependencies. It is also incomprehensible when productive activities with low added value are maintained with imported resources (crude oil, foreign factory workers) in the middle of Europe. It would be much more logical to relocate energy-intensive production facilities to the sources of energy.

Countries like France that have a robust nuclear power production can certainly afford energy-intensive industrial production. However, if, like Germany, you want neither nuclear power nor coal-fired power generation (from domestic coal, nota bene) without any real alternatives to an energy transition, you should not be surprised at the migration of industrial production and low sales figures for electric vehicles in a country with high electricity prices.

In terms of energy policy, the production of wind and solar power is in disarray, as is the electricity transmission infrastructure (sluggish planning and approval procedures). Shutting down its own nuclear power plants and then importing electricity primarily from France (10 terawatt hours so far this year) does not make German policy any more credible.

European economies that are not robust energy producers in particular should focus on high value-added, low-energy sectors and activities.

Those who promote local energy sources create added value in their own economies. Switzerland does this, for example, with its important hydropower production. Hydropower produces 37 TWh annually in this country. By 2040, two additional TWh will be available in winter – thanks to additional reservoirs. On the Grimsel alone, the dam, which has been raised by just 23 meters, has almost doubled the reservoir volume: instead of 94 million cubic meters of water, it will soon be 170 million cubic meters.